{"APAProgramNumber":2445,"InstitutionName":"Augsburg University","InstitutionAdd1":"203 Sverdrup Hall","InstitutionAdd2":"707 21st Ave S","InstitutionAdd3":"","InstitutionCity":"Minneapolis","InstitutionState":"MN","InstitutionZip":"55454","InstitutionCountry":"United States","ProgramLevel":"Doctoral","ProgramDepartment":"Clinical Psychology","ProgramDegree":"Psy.D.","SubstantiveArea":"Clinical Psychology","SettingType":"University (non-Medical)","PracticeArea":"","ProgramDesc":null,"ExecSummary":"This program was previously on “accredited, on contingency” status. At its April 15-18, 2026 meeting, the APA Commission on Accreditation (CoA) reviewed the program’s outcome data and voted to approve full accreditation of the Clinical psychology PsyD program at Augsburg University in Minneapolis, MN, with the next site visit scheduled 10 years from the date of the program's last site visit. This decision is based on the CoA’s professional judgement that the program has demonstrated that it adheres to the Standards of Accreditation in Health Service Psychology (SoA). The current record indicates that a full review of the program is warranted within ten years of its last site visit, including interim reporting, to ensure continued adherence to the Standards.","WebsiteURL":"https://www.augsburg.edu/psyd/","DocC20URL":"https://www.augsburg.edu/psyd/student-admissions-outcomes-and-other-data/","InitialAccredDate":"2021-12-08T00:00:00.000Z","CurrentAccredStatus":"Accredited","NextSiteVisitYear":"2035","HistoricalNames":null,"GrantYears":null,"RegionalAccreditor":null,"Comment_1":null,"Comment_2":null,"Comment_3":null,"ShowOrHide":true,"Guideline":10,"D.I.A.1":0,"D.I.A.2":0,"D.I.B.1":0,"D.I.B.2":0,"D.I.C.1":0,"D.I.C.2":0,"D.I.C.3":0,"D.I.C.4":0,"D.I.D.1":0,"D.I.D.2":0,"D.I.D.3":0,"D.I.D.4":0,"D.I.(AI)":0,"D.II.A.1-2":0,"D.II.B.1.a":1,"D.II.B.1.b":1,"D.II.B.2":0,"D.II.B.3":0,"D.II.B.4.a-b":1,"D.II.C.1":0,"D.II.C.2":0,"D.II.D.1.a":1,"D.II.D.1.b":0,"D.II.D.2.a-b":0,"D.II.D.3":0,"D.II.(AI)":0,"D.III.A.1":0,"D.III.B.1":0,"D.III.B.2":0,"D.III.B.3":0,"D.III.C.1":0,"D.III.C.2":0,"D.III.C.3":0,"D.III.(AI)":0,"D.IV.A.1":0,"D.IV.A.2":0,"D.IV.B.1-2":0,"D.IV.B.3":0,"D.IV.B.4":0,"D.IV.B.5.a":0,"D.IV.B.5.b":0,"D.IV.(AI)":0,"D.V.A.1":0,"D.V.A.2":0,"D.V.A.3":0,"D.V.B.1":0,"D.V.B.2":0,"D.V.(AI)":0,"I.I.A.1":0,"I.I.A.2":0,"I.I.A.3":0,"I.I.B.1":0,"I.I.B.2":0,"I.I.B.3":0,"I.I.B.4":0,"I.I.B.5":0,"I.I.C.1":0,"I.I.C.2":0,"I.I.C.3":0,"I.I.C.4":0,"I.I.D.1":0,"I.I.D.2":0,"I.I.(AI)":0,"I.II.A.1-2":0,"I.II.B.1":0,"I.II.B.2":0,"I.II.C.1":0,"I.II.C.2":0,"I.II.C.3":0,"I.II.D.1.a":0,"I.II.D.1.b":0,"I.II.D.2":0,"I.II.(AI)":0,"I.III.A.1":0,"I.III.A.2":0,"I.III.A.3":0,"I.III.B.1-2":0,"I.III.(AI)":0,"I.IV.A.1":0,"I.IV.A.2-3":0,"I.IV.B":0,"I.IV.(AI)":0,"I.V.A.1":0,"I.V.A.2":0,"I.V.A.3":0,"I.V.B.1":0,"I.V.B.2":0,"I.V.(AI)":0,"P.I.A.1":0,"P.I.A.2":0,"P.I.A.3":0,"P.I.A.4":0,"P.I.B.1":0,"P.I.B.2":0,"P.I.B.3":0,"P.I.B.4":0,"P.I.B.5":0,"P.I.C.1":0,"P.I.C.2":0,"P.I.C.3":0,"P.I.C.4":0,"P.I.C.5":0,"P.I.D.1":0,"P.I.D.2":0,"P.I.(AI)":0,"P.II.A":0,"P.II.B":0,"P.II.C.1":0,"P.II.C.2":0,"P.II.C.3-4":0,"P.II.D.1.a":0,"P.II.D.1.b":0,"P.II.D.2":0,"P.II.(AI)":0,"P.III.A.1":0,"P.III.A.2":0,"P.III.A.3":0,"P.III.B":0,"P.III.(AI)":0,"P.IV.A.1-2":0,"P.IV.B.1":0,"P.IV.B.2":0,"P.IV.C":0,"P.IV.(AI)":0,"P.V.A.1":0,"P.V.A.2":0,"P.V.B.1":0,"P.V.B.2":0,"P.V.(AI)":0,"M.I.A.1":0,"M.I.A.2":0,"M.I.B.1":0,"M.I.B.2":0,"M.I.C.1":0,"M.I.C.2":0,"M.I.C.3":0,"M.I.C.4":0,"M.I.D.1":0,"M.I.D.2":0,"M.I.D.3":0,"M.I.D.4":0,"M.II.A.1-2":0,"M.II.B.1.a":0,"M.II.B.1.b":0,"M.II.B.2":0,"M.II.B.3":0,"M.II.C.1":0,"M.II.D.1.a":0,"M.II.D.1.b":0,"M.II.D.2":0,"M.II.D.3":0,"M.III.A":0,"M.III.B.1":0,"M.III.B.2":0,"M.III.B.3":0,"M.III.C.1":0,"M.III.C.2":0,"M.III.C.3":0,"M.III.C.4":0,"M.IV.A.1":0,"M.IV.A.2":0,"M.IV.A.3":0,"M.IV.B.1-2":0,"M.IV.B.3":0,"M.IV.B.4":0,"M.IV.B.5.a":0,"M.IV.B.5.b":0,"M.V.A.1":0,"M.V.A.2":0,"M.V.B.1":0,"M.V.B.2":0,"StandardsForReporting":"<b>D.II.B.1.a:</b> Discipline-Specific Knowledge\nDiscipline-specific knowledge serves as a cornerstone for the establishment of identity in and orientation to health services psychology. Thus, all students in accredited programs should acquire a general knowledge base in the field of psychology, broadly construed, to serve as a foundation for further training in the practice of health service psychology.\na.\tDiscipline-specific knowledge represents the requisite core knowledge of psychology an individual must have to attain the profession-wide competencies. Programs may elect to demonstrate discipline-specific knowledge of students by:\ni.\tUsing student selection criteria that involve standardized assessments of a foundational knowledge base (e.g., GRE subject tests). In this case, the program must describe how the curriculum builds upon this foundational knowledge to enable students to demonstrate graduate level discipline-specific knowledge. \nii.\tProviding students with broad exposure to discipline-specific knowledge. In this case, the program is not required to demonstrate that students have specific foundational knowledge at entry but must describe how the program’s curriculum enables students to demonstrate graduate-level discipline-specific knowledge.<br/><br/><b>D.II.B.1.b:</b> Profession-wide competencies include certain competencies required for all students who graduate from programs accredited in health service psychology. Programs must provide opportunities for all of their students to achieve and demonstrate each required profession-wide competency. Although in general, the competencies appearing at or near the top of the following list serve as foundations upon which later competencies are built, each competency is considered critical for graduates in programs accredited in health service psychology. The specific requirements for each competency are articulated in Implementing Regulations. Because science is at the core of health service psychology, programs must demonstrate that they rely on the current evidence-base  when training students in the following competency areas.  Students must demonstrate competence in: \ni.\tResearch\nii.\tEthical and legal standards\niii.\tIndividual and cultural diversity\niv.\tProfessional values, attitudes, and behaviors\nv.\tCommunication and interpersonal skills\nvi.\tAssessment\nvii.\tIntervention\nviii.\tSupervision \nix.\tConsultation and interprofessional/interdisciplinary skills<br/><br/><b>D.II.B.4.a-b:</b> Required Internship Training Elements. The program must demonstrate that all students complete a one year full-time or two year part-time internship. The program’s policies regarding student placement at accredited versus unaccredited internships should be consistent with national standards regarding internship training. \n\na.\tAccredited Internships. Students are expected to apply for, and to the extent possible, complete internship training programs that are either APA- or CPA-accredited. For students who attend accredited internships, the doctoral program is required to provide only the specific name of the internship. \nb.\tUnaccredited Internships. When a student attends an unaccredited internship, it is the responsibility of the doctoral program to provide evidence demonstrating quality and adequacy of the internship experience. This must include information on the following: \ni.\tthe nature and appropriateness of the training activities;\nii.\tfrequency and quality of supervision;\niii.\tcredentials of the supervisors;\niv.\thow the internship evaluates student performance;\nv.\thow interns demonstrate competency at the appropriate level; \nvi.\tdocumentation of the evaluation of its students in its student files.<br/><br/><b>D.II.D.1.a:</b> Evaluation of Students’ Competencies\na.\tThe program must evaluate students’ competencies in both profession-defined and program-defined areas. By the time of degree completion, each student must demonstrate achievement of both the profession-wide competencies and those required by the program. Thus, for each competency, the program must:\ni.\tSpecify how it evaluates student performance, and the minimum level of achievement or performance required of the student to demonstrate competency. Programs must demonstrate how their evaluation methods and minimum levels of achievement are appropriate for the measurement of each competency. The level of achievement expected should reflect the current standards for the profession.\nii.\tProvide outcome data that clearly demonstrate that by the time of degree completion, all students have reached the appropriate level of achievement in each profession-wide competency as well as in each program-defined competency. While the program has flexibility in deciding what outcome data to present, the data should reflect assessment that is consistent with best practices in student competency evaluation.\niii.\tPresent formative and summative evaluations linked to exit criteria, as well as data demonstrating achievement of competencies, for each student in the program.<br/><br/>"}